Groveton’s Virginia
One man’s view on the Commonwealth

Deeds Heeds 2006?

Deja Vu all Over Again? – I can’t remember the last time there was a Democratic primary for governor.  Kaine was unopposed for the nomination in 2005.  Warner was unopposed in 2001.  Don Beyer was unopposed in 1997 and anything before that would have represented a Virginia so different from today that it’s not worth considering (in my opinion).  So, how can we analyze this year’s Democratic primary for Governor – to be held June 9?  The best I can conceive is the 2006 statewide election of US Senator.  Jim Webb defeated lobbyist Harris Miller in the 2006 Democratic primary by a 53% to 47% margin.  Webb went on to win the general election over incumbent George Allen with a razor thin margin of victory (49.59% vs. 49.2%).  The general election included the famous (or infamous) Meccaca comment from Sen. Allen.  There are certainly some major differences between 2006 and 2009.  First, 2006 was a national election with all US House members and 1/3 of the US Senate (including George Allen) up for re-election.  There were no state legislature seats up that year (outside of a few special elections).  The governor’s race was still three years away.  There were only two candidates in the primary (Webb and Miller) as opposed to the three candidates running for the Democratic nomination on June 9 (McAuliffe, Moran and Deeds).  However, there was a statewide Democratic primary and I think that bears analysis.

Data Centered Blogging - I am experimenting with a concept I call Data Centered Blogging.  Under this concept certain blog entries are numeric analyses of available data rather than raw opinion or references to newspaper articles and other blogs.  In a perfect world the base data would be stored as a database giving all blog participants read only access to the database and providing tools for the participant to “slice and dice” the data.    But the world is not perfect.  I don’t have a database yet.  What I have is a Google spreadsheet with voter turnout data from the 2006 statewide election.  I will draw some conclusions from that data later in this post.  I also invite you to look at the data and draw conclusions of your own.  I have allowed view access but not update access to the spreadsheet.  If anybody would like update access – please send me a request at Groveton@GMail.Com and I’ll try to add you as a collaborator.  I will be adding data to this spreadsheet so it will expand over time.  You should not have to be signed into Google to view the spreadsheet.  Here is the link:http://spreadsheets.google.com/ccc?key=rPz4MHjPSQC3Ss7vnNd85PQ&hl=en

Overall Analysis - The primary was a low turnout event with only 3.58% of qualified voters voting in the primary.  The turnout for the primary varied greatly by jurisdiction with Falls Church City leading the way with 12.55% of qualified voters voting in the Democratic primary.  Powhatan county took the low end with 1.1% of qualified voters voting.  The general election had a much greater participation with 53.11% of qualified voters casting votes.  Falls Church City again had the greatest percentage participation with  66.41%.   Manassas City came in last with only 37.21% of qualified voters voting in the general election.  The jurisdictions also varied in how actively they voted in the primary vs. general election.  The biggest gainer was Goochland County where only 2.06% of qualified voters voted in the Democratic primary (vs. a state-wide average of 3.58%) yet 66.22% of Goochland’s voters voted in the general election (vs. a statewide average of 53.11%).  It’s probably no surprise that George Allen crushed Jim Webb in Goochland (61% to 39%).  It seems there is plenty of interest in voting but few Democrats.  The biggest decline was in Manassas Park City where 1.43% voted in the primary (vs. a 3.58% mean) and 37.21% voted in the general election (vs. 53.11% average).  I guess they just don’t like voting in Manassas Park City.  Perhaps a better example is Alexandria City where 7.71% voted in the primary (almost twice the state average) but only 51.3% voted in the general election (below the state average).  Webb immolated Allen in Alexandria with a 71% to 29% victory.

Implications for Deeds - If Virginia’s Republicans were forced to vote for one of the three Democratic contenders I think Deeds would win in a landslide.  Of course, Republicans won’t be forced to vote for a Democrat – the vast majority will vote for Bob McDonnell in November.  But what about June?  A lot can happen between the primary and general election.  Skeletons could come out of McDonnell’s closet.  He could say something stupid.  God forbid, he could get sick.  Shouldn’t Republicans want a palatable alternative if something goes wromg in the McDonnell general election campaign?  If 2006 is any lesson, there will be plenty of reliably Republican jurisdictions that will have very low turnout (by voter count and percentage) in the Democratic primary.  These same locales will send plenty of people to the polls in November.  Can Deeds convince them to “hedge their bets” by voting for him in the Democratic primary?  Is this legal?  Is this ethical?

9 Responses to “Deeds Heeds 2006?”

  1. just FYI – I did get to the spreadsheet… good stuff!

  2. Excellent. That’s a first step. Next more data in the spreadsheets, then statistical graphs, then a database then participant queries. We’ll see…

  3. Fan-freaking-tastic spreadsheet! What a public service! Thanks!

  4. Hank -

    Many thanks. I wish I had more time for this kind of stuff. The data mostly out there – somewhere. It’s just not consolidated anywhwere and in “non-analyzable”, read only format. I think my next move is to get the Deeds – McDonnell Attorney General (2005) general election results into the spreadsheet (McDonnell won by the narrowest of margins). Then maybe the Democratic presidential primary in 2008 to see what a high turnout primary looks like.

  5. alankrishnan says…
    Interesting data, great job. Validates that this election will be won by name recognition and GOTV. Thus far McAuliffe appears the best qualified to pull Virginia out of the recession, and the most capable of beating McDonnell.

    Latest polls show McAuliffe leading by 10 points over Moran. This is not surprising as Moran has generally been running a very ineffective campaign on why McAuliffe should not be elected, rather than on why Moran should be elected. I will not be surprised if Deeds soon rises to number 2, trailing McAuliffe and leading Moran. Deeds is a great candidate and should start running for another office once the primaries are over – perhaps Congressman in 2010! He is most likely to endorse McAuliffe at that point and I know McAuliffe will do everything he can to help Deeds get elected to Congress. I now support McAuliffe, but after the Primary I will support Deeds for any office he chooses to run for.

  6. Alan -

    You and I are on a similar wavelength. The issues aren’t resonating so far. There are differences in positions in areas like offshore drilling but those differences aren’t really getting a lot of coverage – by the media or the candidates themselves.

    Terry Mcauliffe is doing a whole lot better than anybody (except Terry) expected in January. His campaign is well organized, he has positioned himself cleverly on the jobs and “I am a businessman” platform and he is a fountain of new and good ideas. I think the big question will be the price tag of his new and good ideas. LarryG (a frequent contributor at Bacons Rebellion) correctly points out that raising the salaries of VA teachers to be at least as high as any adjacent region menas going from a $46,000 per year average in Virginia to a $60,000 average in Maryland. Conceptually, a good idea but maybe $1B+ per year to get done.

    Brian Moran seems a bit lost with his campaign. I am surprised given his political background and political family. Maybe he’s just “keeping his powder dry” for the last 30 days to the primary but if I were his capmaign manager I’d suggest that he start shooting before it’s too late to shoot.

    Creigh Deeds has done more to impress me than any other candidate in where I started vs. where I am now. If you had to pick one of the four to invite for a beer, I’d pick Deeds. If you had to pick one guy to watch your kids for the weekend I’d pick Deeds. He seems very genuine. But he’s playing too heavily on the “I’ve served the Commonwealth for 23 years” schtick. He has been a great public servant but he’ll need more to get elected governor. He needs to emphasize more of his new ideas or emphasize how his plan for the future is more balanced or more affordable than the alternatives.

  7. My impression is that Mcauliffe is a veteran steeped in campaign strategy……

    and Deeds.. is a nice guy … but politically a turnip riding the truck….

    it’s not all personality but …you gotta get yourself and your ideas “out there”… if you want to get noticed…

    In a knock down, drag out fall election… who among the 3 dems is going to be able to take some packyderm punches and come right back ?

  8. Let’s not forget the main thing here is to beat Bob McDonnell. If we beat him we can injure the Republican Party in Virginia for a generation…who’s coming up behind him? The bench is thin.

  9. I’m willing to give a listen on the issues. Went to his website (McDonnell) …clicked on issues.. two things: 1. please contribute 2. – look at all the good stuff I did as AG.

    not a word on transportation, education jobs,….

    did I miss his positions on these and other issues?


Leave a Reply